Stop running your plant on alerts.
Run it on enforced governance.
The Plant Governance Dashboard converts exceptions (late jobs, quality hits, safety stops, maintenance risks, readiness failures) into governed work with explicit ownership, SLA enforcement, hard gates, proof-of-execution, escalation, and a learning loop.
SLA Adherence
Are owners responding on time?
Verification Compliance
Are closures backed by proof?
Repeat Rate
Is the plant learning?
Time to Containment
How fast do we stop the bleed?
Why governance wins when dashboards fail
Visibility tells you what happened. Governance makes sure the right person fixes it, the process prevents escapes, and the system learns so it happens less.
Alerts don’t create accountability
A notification isn’t ownership. Governance assigns a named owner (or role), starts the clock, defines “done,” and escalates when time is missed.
Warnings don’t prevent bad outcomes
A “red status” doesn’t stop a shipment. Governance applies enforceable gates that block ship/move/restart until requirements are satisfied.
Trust doesn’t pass audits
“We handled it” isn’t evidence. Governance requires proof-of-execution, verifier signoff when needed, and an audit log for every state change.
The governance engine
Everything follows a repeatable operational pattern that turns chaos into controlled execution.
What you see on the dashboard
Each section exists to enforce control: prevent bad outcomes, drive execution with proof, and accelerate learning.
-
SSLA Adherence Percent responded/contained within required time.
-
VVerification Compliance Closures include required proof and signoff.
-
RRepeat Rate How often patterns recur (signals learning throughput).
-
TTime to Containment Detection → containment in place (median or P90).
Enforceable constraints that prevent escapes and bad moves:
- QQuality holds / controlled shipping Block ship/move until disposition + authorization.
- SSafety restart verification Restart is illegal until verification is complete.
- MMaintenance do-not-run Hard constraint based on risk, PM overdue, or condition.
- RDispatch readiness Material/tooling/skill/first-article readiness enforced before release.
Raw “what just happened” signals from machines, people, and systems. Events are inputs — not action lists.
- ⚙Machine alarms / process OOC SPC triggers, downtime states, cycle anomalies.
- ⏱Late order risks Dispatch conflicts, constraint overload, promise-date threats.
- ✖Scrap spikes / rework Abnormal losses and repeat signatures.
- ✓Missed inspections Control plan required checks and verifications.
The commanded worklist. Every card removes ambiguity:
- 👤Owner Named or role-based with authority rules.
- ⏳SLA clock Respond / contain / verify / close timers.
- ⛔Gate status What is blocked until action/proof is complete.
- 📎Proof required Data, photo, checklist, signoff, system confirmations.
- ⬆Escalation Role ladder + broadcast when overdue.
The control room view. Click any queue item to run controlled execution:
- ↔Upstream/Downstream context Last op / next op visibility for containment alignment.
- 🔒Linked gates Holds, inspection required, release required, safety restart.
- ☑Action checklist Role-specific “done” definition.
- 🧾Audit log Who did what, when, with what proof.
Governance lanes that prevent escapes and enforce systemic improvement.
- IInspection Due/In progress/Pass/Fail/Review with strict sampling + results capture.
- RRelease Authorized roles only; reason + conditions + expiry for conditional release.
- CCAR Stage-gated containment → root cause → PCA → effectiveness → close.
- LLearning Loop Controlled updates to PFMEA/Control Plan/SOP/Routing/Training.
Built for how leaders actually run a plant
Governance aligns daily cadence across production, quality, engineering, and management—so the plant stays under control.
- ⏱Hourly Filter Action Queue by area/role; clear top overdue risks.
- 📎Proof Ensure containment includes evidence before verification/close.
- ⛔Flow Clear release bottlenecks; escalate stuck items.
- IPer shift Work Inspection & Release lane; disposition failures and MRB decisions.
- ✓Compliance Enforce verification rules; prevent “paper close.”
- CTriggers Ensure repeat/escape thresholds open CAR automatically.
- CDaily/weekly Drive CAR stages and systemic changes.
- LLearning Update PFMEA/Control Plan/SOP/Routing/Training as governed work.
- 📉Outcomes Reduce repeat rate, escapes, and time-to-containment.
Enforcement fabric: how “governance” becomes real
Governance must be enforceable—digitally, visually, and (when needed) physically. TSRB coordinates the enforcement path across your systems.
- 📲Mobile acknowledgement Push/SMS/email with required ACK + response capture.
- ⬆Escalation ladder Time misses increase visibility and urgency, not just notifications.
- 🧾Auditability Every action writes to an audit log with timestamps and actors.
- ERPERP blocks Holds, ship/move restrictions, dispositions, status sync.
- QMSQMS linkage Nonconformance, MRB, CAR objects tied to governed work.
- TPMCMMS/TPM Do-not-run constraints and maintenance workflow synchronization.
- ANDAndon / big screens Broadcast gate state + ownership + timer for line visibility.
- APIAPIs / webhooks Ingest events and publish gate outcomes to external tools.
FAQ
Quick answers for operators, quality, engineering, and leadership.
Is this just another dashboard?
No. Dashboards show status. Governance enforces action: owner + SLA + escalation + gates + proof + audit trail + learning updates.
What makes a “gate” different from an alert?
An alert warns. A gate blocks a transition (ship/move/restart/dispatch) until policy is satisfied—inspection, release authorization, verification, or safety restart proof.
How do you prevent “paper close”?
Closure is disabled until required proof is attached, verification is complete (when required), and all linked gates are cleared—plus CAR/learning requirements if policy triggers.
How does Inspection → Release → CAR connect?
Inspection produces disposition (PASS/FAIL/REVIEW). Release is authorization (role-limited; conditional with expiry). CAR is the learning object that prevents recurrence and forces artifact updates.
Can it work with our ERP/QMS/MES?
Yes—via APIs/webhooks and database integrations. The key is enforcement: holds, ship/move blocks, dispositions, and synchronized state transitions.
What’s the fastest proof of value?
Pick one recurring pain: repeat defect, missed inspections, safety restarts, chronic late jobs. We wire the rules, gates, and proof requirements—then measure SLA adherence, repeat rate, and time-to-containment.
Stop running your plant on alerts.
Run it on enforced governance.
The Plant Governance Dashboard converts exceptions (late jobs, quality hits, safety stops, maintenance risks, readiness failures) into governed work with explicit ownership, SLA enforcement, hard gates, proof-of-execution, escalation, and a learning loop.
SLA Adherence
Are owners responding on time?
Verification Compliance
Are closures backed by proof?
Repeat Rate
Is the plant learning?
Time to Containment
How fast do we stop the bleed?
Why governance wins when dashboards fail
Visibility tells you what happened. Governance makes sure the right person fixes it, the process prevents escapes, and the system learns so it happens less.
Alerts don’t create accountability
A notification isn’t ownership. Governance assigns a named owner (or role), starts the clock, defines “done,” and escalates when time is missed.
Warnings don’t prevent bad outcomes
A “red status” doesn’t stop a shipment. Governance applies enforceable gates that block ship/move/restart until requirements are satisfied.
Trust doesn’t pass audits
“We handled it” isn’t evidence. Governance requires proof-of-execution, verifier signoff when needed, and an audit log for every state change.
The governance engine
Everything follows a repeatable operational pattern that turns chaos into controlled execution.
What you see on the dashboard
Each section exists to enforce control: prevent bad outcomes, drive execution with proof, and accelerate learning.
-
SSLA Adherence Percent responded/contained within required time.
-
VVerification Compliance Closures include required proof and signoff.
-
RRepeat Rate How often patterns recur (signals learning throughput).
-
TTime to Containment Detection → containment in place (median or P90).
Enforceable constraints that prevent escapes and bad moves:
- QQuality holds / controlled shipping Block ship/move until disposition + authorization.
- SSafety restart verification Restart is illegal until verification is complete.
- MMaintenance do-not-run Hard constraint based on risk, PM overdue, or condition.
- RDispatch readiness Material/tooling/skill/first-article readiness enforced before release.
Raw “what just happened” signals from machines, people, and systems. Events are inputs — not action lists.
- ⚙Machine alarms / process OOC SPC triggers, downtime states, cycle anomalies.
- ⏱Late order risks Dispatch conflicts, constraint overload, promise-date threats.
- ✖Scrap spikes / rework Abnormal losses and repeat signatures.
- ✓Missed inspections Control plan required checks and verifications.
The commanded worklist. Every card removes ambiguity:
- 👤Owner Named or role-based with authority rules.
- ⏳SLA clock Respond / contain / verify / close timers.
- ⛔Gate status What is blocked until action/proof is complete.
- 📎Proof required Data, photo, checklist, signoff, system confirmations.
- ⬆Escalation Role ladder + broadcast when overdue.
The control room view. Click any queue item to run controlled execution:
- ↔Upstream/Downstream context Last op / next op visibility for containment alignment.
- 🔒Linked gates Holds, inspection required, release required, safety restart.
- ☑Action checklist Role-specific “done” definition.
- 🧾Audit log Who did what, when, with what proof.
Governance lanes that prevent escapes and enforce systemic improvement.
- IInspection Due/In progress/Pass/Fail/Review with strict sampling + results capture.
- RRelease Authorized roles only; reason + conditions + expiry for conditional release.
- CCAR Stage-gated containment → root cause → PCA → effectiveness → close.
- LLearning Loop Controlled updates to PFMEA/Control Plan/SOP/Routing/Training.
Built for how leaders actually run a plant
Governance aligns daily cadence across production, quality, engineering, and management—so the plant stays under control.
- ⏱Hourly Filter Action Queue by area/role; clear top overdue risks.
- 📎Proof Ensure containment includes evidence before verification/close.
- ⛔Flow Clear release bottlenecks; escalate stuck items.
- IPer shift Work Inspection & Release lane; disposition failures and MRB decisions.
- ✓Compliance Enforce verification rules; prevent “paper close.”
- CTriggers Ensure repeat/escape thresholds open CAR automatically.
- CDaily/weekly Drive CAR stages and systemic changes.
- LLearning Update PFMEA/Control Plan/SOP/Routing/Training as governed work.
- 📉Outcomes Reduce repeat rate, escapes, and time-to-containment.
Enforcement fabric: how “governance” becomes real
Governance must be enforceable—digitally, visually, and (when needed) physically. TSRB coordinates the enforcement path across your systems.
- 📲Mobile acknowledgement Push/SMS/email with required ACK + response capture.
- ⬆Escalation ladder Time misses increase visibility and urgency, not just notifications.
- 🧾Auditability Every action writes to an audit log with timestamps and actors.
- ERPERP blocks Holds, ship/move restrictions, dispositions, status sync.
- QMSQMS linkage Nonconformance, MRB, CAR objects tied to governed work.
- TPMCMMS/TPM Do-not-run constraints and maintenance workflow synchronization.
- ANDAndon / big screens Broadcast gate state + ownership + timer for line visibility.
- APIAPIs / webhooks Ingest events and publish gate outcomes to external tools.
FAQ
Quick answers for operators, quality, engineering, and leadership.
Is this just another dashboard?
No. Dashboards show status. Governance enforces action: owner + SLA + escalation + gates + proof + audit trail + learning updates.
What makes a “gate” different from an alert?
An alert warns. A gate blocks a transition (ship/move/restart/dispatch) until policy is satisfied—inspection, release authorization, verification, or safety restart proof.
How do you prevent “paper close”?
Closure is disabled until required proof is attached, verification is complete (when required), and all linked gates are cleared—plus CAR/learning requirements if policy triggers.
How does Inspection → Release → CAR connect?
Inspection produces disposition (PASS/FAIL/REVIEW). Release is authorization (role-limited; conditional with expiry). CAR is the learning object that prevents recurrence and forces artifact updates.
Can it work with our ERP/QMS/MES?
Yes—via APIs/webhooks and database integrations. The key is enforcement: holds, ship/move blocks, dispositions, and synchronized state transitions.
What’s the fastest proof of value?
Pick one recurring pain: repeat defect, missed inspections, safety restarts, chronic late jobs. We wire the rules, gates, and proof requirements—then measure SLA adherence, repeat rate, and time-to-containment.